Professional competence in this trade rests on three pillars — understanding gemstones (identification, grading, valuation), design (the creative value-add, historically kept close to home), and trade practice (moving high-value goods responsibly) — alongside a wide range of fabrication and assembly methods, from factory production to artisan hand skills. Each is under-served:
The official dataset (Q3-2026) lists 12,007 TSCs across 41 sector entries — 33 industry sectors plus 8 cross-sector skill sets, grouped by SSG into roughly 27 industry frameworks. None is jewellery, gemmology or watchmaking. To test whether the existing skills could nonetheless cover the trade, all 28 programmes of Singapore's specialist jewellery school (JDMIS) were audited: each course was mapped to its single nearest TSC, and the course's taught content compared line by line against that TSC's official Knowledge-and-Ability items. Not one course maps cleanly.
The twenty skills are listed in the annex at the end of this brief. JDMIS is happy to work with SWDA on a skill-by-skill draft with knowledge-and-ability items and international cross-references, but has limited resourses and will require SWDA involvement during development to ensure available resources are deployed productively.
We ask that SWDA review and consider a multi-skill jewellery family in the framework, and flag the craft core for the Course Approval Skills List — co-developed with JDMIS and the trade associations, drawing on the ready-made international standards. This single update opens the standard funding door for current and new jewellery training providers in Singapore. With assistance from SDWA to ensure efficient submissions, the school's TP statis can be restored (its contract was ended without notice for 'inactivity' because of the lack of framework to map to) and its existing programmes mapped to these skills.
Further, we ask SWDA consider these courses be arranged as a stackable pathway as they have been delivered by JDMIS for 18 years — entry modules through to advanced diploma, with job roles to progress through — it gives working adults, new entrants and owner-operators somewhere to start and somewhere to go, which today does not exist. A national pathwar would also benefit the training ecosystem allowing high levels of provider specialisation and a full CET centre for the industry. A full sector framework can be considered following industry adoption. Any implementations must be sure to be inclusive of the large number of owner-operators and micro-enterprises that are prevalent in the jewellery industry.
JDMIS and the industry's employer network stand ready to support development and delivery.
Reference is made to JDMIS's letter of 1 September 2026 (JDMIS/MOS-FC/2026-01) and its annexes. In brief, the record on the ground is strong: eighteen years of specialist delivery; 8,041 skills certifications issued to 3,484 people, including staff of 250+ Singapore jewellery companies; a mid-2024 SkillsFuture trainee-feedback snapshot of 317 ratings at 4.4/5 — higher in number and score than the fashion and jewellery providers then on the platform — alongside 6,825 public reviews averaging 4.8/5; an SSG audit in 2024 with no adverse observations and no learner complaints; and graduates who have established more than 170 jewellery businesses, with 300+ career changers entering the trade. When support existed (2021–2024, championed by MOS Low Yen Ling), modular enrolment roughly doubled — from about 400 to nearly 1,000 a year — and employers and individuals wrote to the agencies in support: 50 employers in 2017, a 238-signatory petition of thanks in 2022.
That support was withdrawn on framework-tagging grounds — not on quality grounds. The lesson this record points to is not about one school: excellence on the ground has been demonstrated, and on its own it has not produced structural change within the agencies. What the trade needs now is direction from the right parts of government: a framework the agencies can see, employers can use, and Singaporeans can progress through.
Five tracks, twenty skills. Descriptions are verb-first in SSG style; proficiency levels (PL) follow SSG's six-level scale. Each skill is drawn from SSG-approved course content and cross-referenced to the UK national occupational standards, the WorldSkills jewellery standard and the recognised UK occupation. Knowledge-and-ability items for every skill are in the technical annex for SSG and SWDA.
Track A — Gemmology and Materials
Track B — Design
Track C — Digital Design and Production
Track D — Fabrication
Track E — Business and Trade